← BYB Mini Decision AidSAMPLE — NO CUSTOMER DATA
BYB OS / EXECUTIVE DECISION

ScopeLock AI

Pre-merge change control for AI-assisted solo SaaS founders. Every person, payment, metric, and evidence item below is fictional.

DecisionGO_SMALLOne narrow paid pilot only
Evidence confidence0.68 / MediumCoverage, not success odds
Decision stabilityStable3/3 runs returned GO_SMALL
Score audit67.6 / 100Secondary diagnostic
Decision in one sentence

Build only a pre-merge change-plan reviewer for TypeScript/Next.js solo SaaS repositories, because the fictional scenario contains repeated pain, clean payment, and an executable owned channel — but incumbent absorption and repeat-use behavior remain unresolved.

Why this call

  1. Repeated costly behavior: 9 of 12 fictional founders reported an AI-driven rewrite or rollback in 30 days; six named unrelated re-testing as the expensive part.
  2. Clean paid signal: three independent fictional buyers paid the same $19 non-refundable public offer and did not join discovery.
  3. Executable distribution: a fictional 850-person owned newsletter produced 46 clicks, 11 checklist requests, and all three purchases.

Strongest counterevidence

Cursor, GitHub Copilot, CodeRabbit, or repository-rule features could absorb the workflow. If users treat it as a temporary prompt, repeat value and defensibility collapse.

Founder × Distribution limit

The owned newsletter supports a pilot, not a broad launch. Limit authorization to one workflow, one stack, and five paid users. Do not build an IDE, autonomous agent, dashboard, team permissions, or multi-language support.

What happens next

Primary blocker

Will a paid founder run the review before merging without concierge prompting?

Seven-day validation action

  1. Freeze one promise and one onboarding path.
  2. Prepare three representative change-plan fixtures.
  3. Let five fictional paid pilot users run one real plan without a call.
  4. Record what they changed, ignored, and why.
  5. Check voluntary second use and issue the next verdict.

What evidence changes the call

Toward GO: 4/5 complete independently, 3/5 narrow a real decision, and at least two return or pay again.
Back to WATCH: fewer than three complete independently, or interpretation stays manual.
STOP this direction: no voluntary second use, or native incumbent tools match the value at lower setup and trust cost.
BYB OS public format sampleAI-first, Founder-reviewed · v0.5

Demonstration only. ScopeLock AI does not exist; this page is not market research, customer evidence, or a product-performance claim.